Update docblock of having() #295
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rvm-peercode
force-pushed
the
having-docblock
branch
from
a2d57b8
to
3339054
Compare
Xerkus
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2024
Fixes: laminas#296 Signed-off-by: Roel van Meer <roel.van.meer@peercode.nl>
Xerkus
force-pushed
the
having-docblock
branch
from
3339054
to
782890b
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Update docblock of having() function. The code makes it clear that a Having object is a valid value for the $predicate argument. Update the docblock to make that explicit.